
PREFACE:
I’m not really sure, after reading this book, why, in some of the religious circles I find myself, this book and author are so controversial. I understand the rejection of a trendy and shallow version of the emerging(ent) church movement, everybody just rushing toward something newer and better, forming clubs, a new “christianese” dialect, so on and so forth. It’s so annoying really.
So much of what he is explaining (or as he says, “confessing”) in this book is how he got from point A, to point B, to point C, to point D, to point E, etc. Anglo-Evangelicalism in America is just grabbing onto point E with both hands because it’s in fashion (but when point A was in fashion, they clenched and choked it too) and they have no idea about all the points in between, the journey, the difficulty. It’s just a trend to them.
So, I can see why this shift toward point E is so perplexing to the rest of evangelicals who don’t relate to point B thru point E, and are unwilling to just dive in head first to embracing point E because everyone else is doing it. I empathize.
But damned if this book didn’t elevate my sights towards Jesus and leave me thrilled to follow him!
END OF PREFACE
In this book, McLaren describes orthodoxy as “how we search for a kind of truth you can never fully get into your head, so instead you seek to get your head (and heart) into it.” He claims later in this passage to be merely advocating a sort of humility about what we can know. Not that truth is relative and everything is cool: but a sort of happy tension between knowing and not-knowing. As the previous quote implies, our God is too vast to fit within the confines of our heads, so instead of trying to fit him into us, we get lost in him. “We must be open to the perpetual possibility that our received understandings of the gospel may be faulty, imbalanced, poorly nuanced, or downright warped and twisted.” And if God is infinite, of course this is possible! We should be worried (or think ourselves God–which would be a huge mistake) if this weren’t possible: “The day we are completely satisfied with what we have been doing; the day we have found the perfect, unchangeable system of work, the perfect answer, never in need of being corrected again, on that day we will know that we are wrong, that we have made the greatest mistake of all.” (Vincent Donovan, “Christianity Rediscovered”, quoted in the book).
In this way, to many, McLaren comes across as a relativist with loosy-floosy doctrine. But you’d have to actually sit down and read the book to see that his position really isn’t all that wacko. I expected to be in danger from reading this book, but found instead to relate to quite a few of his “confessions.”
His book, in a lot of ways, seems to be a commentary on G.K. Chesterton’s classic “Orthodox” but it really goes beyond Chesterton. He works his way through fragmented subgroups of Christianity (fundamentalists, evangelicals, pentacostals, catholics, calvinists, liberals, etc.) showing what each has contributed to a more full and complete “orthodoxy” (more… but not there yet; he makes sure to show how each group, though helpful in knowing God better, isn’t “good to go” but still needs to be reformed, and we all need EACH OTHER for that).